Showing posts with label development. Show all posts
Showing posts with label development. Show all posts

Sunday, October 31, 2010

Design in Practice/"Design i praksis" new book




"Design i praksis: designledelse og innovasjon" (in Norw.), exhibited in Norli bookstore, Oslo, October 2010. Photo: Birgit Helene Jevnaker.

31.10.2010
This autumn, we, Per Farstad and myself, have finished our new book with Universitetsforlaget.

APPROACHES FOR DESIGN AND INNOVATION. The book is dealing with creative challenges and opportunities for designing and innovating in projects with others in realworld situations. Ten transdisciplinary work approaches are introduced for projects of many kinds - in service or product development, concept development, innovation and design. We suggest the work approaches are potentially relevant across several design disciplines and other making and planning disciplines including management, and especially in the current situation where both design and management fields seem to be under scrutiny and transformation.

PERSPECTIVES ON CREATING SOMETHING. No doubt, there are currently many new or latent problems surfacing in and across projects and organizations. From many years of work practice, studies and teaching, we have learned how students as well as scholars and practitioners are often striving with both innovation and developmental work including the conception of something new and different. Or how to actually renew and strenghten something already proven to sustain its actual or potential values? These are among the questions we explore throughout the book, drawing on research and experiential insights from realworld examples.

DESIGN ISSUES AND COLLABORATIONS. The book builds on the premises that platforms and collaborations for good designing are something that is constructed and unfold in practice. It thus delineates and discusses a number of design and developmental issues and seeks to provide new or synthetized perspectives, work methods/tools, and knowledge that we suggest can help something new or existing to become attractive as well as viable in practice. This is however a continuous and often complex challenge but one that we as humans can work on - with and for others.
Any experience, comment and suggestion that can help us to improve this, is welcome. birgit.h.jevnaker@bi.no

See more on Universitetsforlaget

Sunday, May 16, 2010

Relevance: Will Diaspora need to SCALE to "hundreds of millions"?

Today I posted this comment following up Jonathan Higgins comment regarding Diaspora (see a recent post for intro):

Will Diaspora or other alternative distributed friendsfeeds solutions need to SCALE to "hundreds of millions" to be relevant? Good Q Jonathan!

On the one hand, I guess perhaps not (though I do not know the technical details).
Because I guess socially, Friendsfeeds can still become very relevant IF it can attract many cliques of friends and thus gain some critical mass also among smaller networks of friends. If it becomes popular, the new practices can then become endemic spreading further.

On the other hand, "users" have actually got new habits through FB and its huge scaling. Some might enjoy to continue friendsfeeding and group connecting through the possibilities of a huge mass social medium. While others may rather wish to move on to more free and "true" friendfeed networks. Thus it might differ among us where and how we may wish to continue. This is only some preliminary thoughts... wish to learn more!

Posted on the website ReadWriteStart by: Birgit | May 16, 2010 3:13 AM

Friday, May 14, 2010

The Four Freedoms, listen to Stallman

Photo courtesy of Think Ubuntu.

SOFTWARE AS COOKING. Freedom for computer use can be compared with cooking, according to Richard Stallman, Free Software Foundation. You should be able to do four things:

0. Freedom to use the recipe (or software) when you want
1. Freedom to look at ingredients and change them
2. Freedom to copy recipes and share with your friend
3. Freedom to write down your version of a recipe and give it to the community

These are four essential freedoms for software use as well.
Learn more from GNU website (courtesy http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html):

“Free software” is a matter of liberty, not price. To understand the concept, you should think of “free” as in “free speech,” not as in “free beer.”

Free software is a matter of the users' freedom to run, copy, distribute, study, change and improve the software. More precisely, it means that the program's users have the four essential freedoms:

  • The freedom to run the program, for any purpose (freedom 0).
  • The freedom to study how the program works, and change it to make it do what you wish (freedom 1). Access to the source code is a precondition for this.
  • The freedom to redistribute copies so you can help your neighbor (freedom 2).
  • The freedom to distribute copies of your modified versions to others (freedom 3). By doing this you can give the whole community a chance to benefit from your changes. Access to the source code is a precondition for this. (END of citation)

THE PHILOSOPHER. Richard Stallman is behind the GNU project that Linux became a part of. He says nobody knows how people actually use software. Indeed, he does not want tracking of free software.
Stallman rather wants you to defend the four freedoms of free software.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:051118-WSIS.2005-Richard.Stallman.ogg

Thursday, May 13, 2010

Centralized or distributed friendsfeeds? Notice Diaspora

The Diaspora team maxwell daniel raphael ilya
(Courtesy for photo: joindiaspora.com)

SOCIAL MEDIA EXPLOITATION. Currently, much of the attention and discussions in mass media and among companies are focused on how to enter, use and exploit rapidly growing social media such as Facebook (about half of the population of Norway is apparently already having an account on FB).
However, many issues of reuse, commercialization and privacy seem yet unsolved. Would Facebook administrators for example share our FB information and emergent behaviours with corporate others such as publishing houses or magazine sellers?

While some corporations and publishing houses are debating the new media possibilities of reaching potential customers in new ways through Facebook, some users and developers are already looking for alternative and what they see as less centralized ways of sharing news and other content with friends.

THE BIG QUESTION is how to actually combine sharing content with (many or selective) others with some privacy intact or at least a degree of self-governance of your "own" information, pics, news feeds, variety of connections and other activities including both social and purchasing behaviour.

DIASPORA. Notice the alternative project Diaspora by a dedicated "boy-band" it seems, of young developers and students (from NYU). At least when you see four of them on You Tube, seems to be a devoted group of young men, check out the link below where they introduce their dedication to working on this current project. (Need to check out more on their backgrounds and interests later!)
See some introduction first here:
Is Your Startup Too Geeky? Written by Audrey Watters / May 15, 2010 http://bit.ly/cc42Vr

TEAM EXPLAINING. The current Diaspora Team is: Maxwell, Daniel, Raphael and Ilya. Hear the guys self-explaining their project here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oqxQgfQD24M&feature=player_embedded

NAME BACKGROUND. Diaspora, what does it mean? A diaspora (in Greek, διασπορά – "a scattering [of seeds]")
- and according to Wikipedia it is "any movement of a population sharing common national and/or ethnic identity. While refugees may or may not ultimately settle in a new geographic location, the term diaspora refers to a permanently displaced and relocated collective."
(It is a name with a long history of meanings connected to for example exciles of people which is beyond this post).

- according to the current Diaspora project (link) is specifically "the privacy aware, personally controlled, do-it-all distributed open source social network."

I guess we might also associate this with the possible future alternatives, complementaries, and/or excile from FB?

Ron Callary over at Inventorspot says:
- The central premise is to replicate the Facebook user experience that’s proven popular (until recent date), but to allow the Diaspora social network to be available on users’ own personal Web servers -- called “seeds.” This differs from Facebook's centralized user interface that claims ownership of users’ content and marketable data while running roughshod over their privacy data. At the rate at which Diaspora is growing and gaining funding, if it continues at its current pace, it might be the Facebook alternative many ex-FBers are looking for.

If anyone has more info on the further work of this free and possibly antifacebook project, please share with us.

UPDATES AND COMMENTS:
Jonathan Higgins comments on Diaspora on 16 May 2010 on the ReadWriteWeb:

- Will that scale ? Time will tell.
Does Diaspora need to scale to hundreds of millions of "users" to be relevant ?
Now that's a question that's worth thinking about.

(SEE my comment in separate new post 16 May).

Friday, September 25, 2009

Leadership in Action 10 years in action



10 years
This autumn is the tenth year for arranging the Leadership in Action program, a final special leadership and organization program in the Bachelor of Management executive education of BI Norwegian School of Management. On 18 august 2009, most of the teachers and administrative supporters involved were meeting up for a FAGSEMINAR at BI. Kari-Mette Mørdre made the very good WHITE LADY cake herself. I think the photos suggest lots of good spirit in LiA.

BRIEF BACKGROUND. It originates in an initiative Spring 1998, when a program proposal was developed by two associate professors, Agneta Karlsson and myself with encouraging support from a few BI administrators (incl. Dag Aadne Sandbakken).
Back then, Agneta and I were both newly recruited to BI. A suggestion from our head of Dep Rolv P. Amdam put the two of us together on the task.
Accidently, it turned out that we had ideas, backgrounds and hope for approaches, which were not difficult to tune. Complimentary competences and many a good laugh together probably also helped make the proposal real quickly, we were both eager to start something new & somewhat different from conventional, mainly one-way classroom teaching, although we kept, and tried to strengthen, the theoretical inquiry - by good scholars as well as students themselves.

In brief, we wanted the student to go on an active learning journey with other adult learners - from the initial grounding when formulating own challenges, to learning to find own literature to respond to own themes of interest, and grounding this in both theoretical reflections and own good examples and experiences. Leadership in Action allows to explore all this further in own term paper project - doing small studies in own organizations. The latter is not unique for this course, but some other ingredients were perhaps more unique such as finding your own literature, writing a synopsis and engaging further via a special synopsis exam. Or doing ARL tasks and reflective dialogues as part of the learning trying to weave the various aspects together in an experience. Of course everything was not so clear by then, but these aspects emerged soon in our development and experimental work with the course.
We also tried to respond to the adult and diverse learner by having a blend of good ingredients and ways of learning in each learning module - theory lectures preferably with some research frontier critical reflections, student group exercises in the form of action reflection learning, insights from selfreflective practitioners as guest lectures and lots of dialogues. In the process, when becoming the first teachers of the course, we learned to really appreciate the many spontaneous and emergent possibilities for learning among experienced adults from many parts of business and the society.

The program became approved already in 1998, yet it turned out that it was too late to launch it that same year. So first course realization was Autumn 1999, that is, ten years ago. It started with one class offered by BI's Net studies, teachers were both Agneta and myself, as said, and Kjersti Hatlevold and Boas became excellent adm supporters. We had great fun doing this together!

Later on, another class started in Oslo and one in Bergen and eventually 6 classes were up and running, i.e., from 2007/2008 (And some time before that, Agneta had stepped down and also moved back to Åland, but even before that, or later on, many other good persons were recruited as local responsible teachers such as Stein Lavik, Roald Nomme, Tonje Haalien, Randi Skare, Elisabeth Seim, Ragnhild Wiik, Frode Solberg, Leif-Runar Forsth, Jennifer Teague and Benedicte Brøgger and also several administrators became key and have contributed recurrently to the program).
This autumn it is 8 classes: 1 Net studies, 2 in Oslo, 1 Bergen, 1 Stavanger, 1 Drammen (new) and 1-2 Stavanger coarranging with and for Kristiansand.

This brief story is summarized after memory for this blog and is only one initial personal part of the background, of course. It is way much more to say about the further development of content, and the students' manifold practice backgrounds, searching abilities and course activities. What we have encountered and what we try to bring about in this course, may be another posting.
Just like to add that the name Leadership in Action, (or sometimes called just LiA) came later (an idea/initiative from me, to help signify its identity and orientation with a short name).

Tuesday, July 7, 2009

Prize for 'Sun in the box' cooker

Jon Bøhmer, the entrepreneur behind the Kyoto box get media attention via e.g. BBC and Richard Black
Environment correspondent, BBC News website

"A cheap solar cooker has won first prize in a contest for green ideas.

The Kyoto Box is made from cardboard and can be used for sterilising water or boiling or baking food.

The Kenyan-based inventor hopes it can make solar cooking widespread in the developing world, supplanting the use of wood which is driving deforestation."

Source: http://twurl.nl/l153sa

Heia Jon! Who is from Hedmark, Norway.